[Apheresis Techniques for the Treatment of Hyperbilirubinemia in the Nephrology Unit].

Therapeutic apheresis is an important hematological and nephrological method for conditions with altered plasma composition. It is also indicated for the removal of protein-bound molecules, such as bilirubin. Several techniques can remove these compounds, such as the extracorporeal circulation molecular adsorption system (MARS), plasma exchange (PEX), and plasma adsorption and perfusion (PAP). Here we report our experience in the comparison between MARS, PEX and PAP, since current guidelines do not specify which method is the most appropriate and under which circumstances it should be used. The choice of technique cannot be based on the desired plasma bilirubin concentration, since these three techniques show similar results with a similar final outcome (exitus). In fact, PAP, PEX and MARS significantly reduce bilirubin levels, but the degree of reduction is not different among the three. Furthermore, the three techniques do not differ in the rate of cholinesterase change, while less reduction of liver transaminases was found by using PAP. MARS should be preferred in the case of renal involvement (hepatorenal syndrome with hyperbilirubinemia). PAP has the advantage of being simple and inexpensive. PEX remains an option when emergency PAP is not available, but the risk of using blood products (plasma and albumin) must be considered.

The effect of donation frequency on donor health in blood donors donating plasma by plasmapheresis: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: The demand for plasma products is growing, necessitating an increase in plasma collection by plasmapheresis. While the 20th edition of the European Guidelines permits plasma donors in Europe to donate with 96-h donation intervals, the potential short- and long-term consequences of high-frequency plasma donations on donor health remain unknown. This study aims to measure the effect of plasma donation frequency on plasma protein composition, including total serum protein (TSP) and immunoglobulin G (IgG), in Norwegian male blood donors. METHODS: This randomized controlled trial (RCT) included 120 male blood donors who were randomized into two intervention groups and one control group: high-frequency plasma donors (HFPDs) who donated 650 mL of plasma 3 times every 2 weeks, whereas regular-frequency plasma donors (RFPDs) who donated 650 mL of plasma 1 time every 2 weeks. The control group consisted of whole blood donors. The primary outcomes are the concentrations of TSP and IgG. DISCUSSION: The findings from this study may have implications for recommendations related to donor health and plasma donation frequencies and may contribute to supporting the strategic independence of plasma products in Norway and Europe without compromising donor health. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT05179200 . Registered December 20th, 2021.

Assessing the comparative efficacy of plasmapheresis and Intravenous immunoglobulin in myasthenia gravis treatment: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Myasthenia gravis (MG) is an autoimmune neuromuscular disorder characterized by muscle weakness, posing significant challenges to patients' daily lives. Intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) and plasmapheresis are two prominent immunomodulatory therapies used in MG management, but the choice between them remains a clinical dilemma. This systematic review and meta-analysis aim to evaluate the comparative efficacy of IVIG versus plasmapheresis in MG management. METHODS: We adhered to PRISMA guidelines and prospectively registered the review protocol in PROSPERO. Systematic search across electronic databases identified 14 studies meeting inclusion criteria. Data from these studies were extracted, and assessed risk of bias. Primary outcomes included clinical efficacy, while secondary outcomes encompassed hospitalization, ventilation, antibody titers, and treatment-related complications. Statistical analysis was conducted using R software. RESULTS: The pooled results indicated that patients receiving plasmapheresis had higher odds of any improvement in MG symptoms compared to IVIG. However, change in severity scores did not significantly differ between the two treatments. Hospitalization durations were similar, but IVIG-treated patients tended to have shorter stays. Antibody titers, particularly anti-MUSK antibodies, favored plasmapheresis treatment. Complication rates were comparable between two groups. However, severe complications were more common in plasmapheresis. CONCLUSION: This comprehensive analysis suggests that plasmapheresis may offer superior short-term symptom improvement in MG compared to IVIG, while IVIG may lead to shorter hospital stays and lower complication rates. The choice between these treatments should be tailored to individual patient needs and disease characteristics. Further research is needed to explore long-term outcomes and mortality rates in MG management.

Divide et Vinces, Therapeutic Apheresis in Nephrological Clinical Practice.

Therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) or plasmapheresis has been used in various life-threatening diseases as a primary treatment or in combination with other therapies. It was first successfully employed in the 1960s for diseases like Waldenström's disease and myeloma. Since then, TPE techniques using apheresis membranes have been introduced. Apheresis therapies separate plasma components from blood using membrane screening or centrifugation methods. TPE aims to remove substances involved in the pathophysiology of diseases. It selectively removes high-molecular-weight molecules, substances with prolonged half-life, and those associated with disease pathogenesis. TPE can be performed using membranes or centrifugation, with replacement of extracted plasma volume using albumin or fresh frozen plasma. TPE requires specific competencies in nephrology and can be prescribed and monitored by nephrologists and performed by dialysis nursing staff. TPE can be combined with adsorption-based therapies to enhance its effect, and this approach is called plasma filtration adsorption. Another variation is double plasma filtration, which selectively removes substances based on molecular size. TPE can also be combined with lipoprotein removal strategies for managing familial hypercholesterolemia. TPE is an affordable extracorporeal therapy that benefits patients with life-threatening diseases. It requires collaboration between nephrologists and other specialists, and our results demonstrate successful TPE without anticoagulation in general hospitalization or outpatient settings.

Plasmapheresis in the ICU.

Therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) is a treatment paradigm used to remove harmful molecules from the body. In short, it is a technique that employs a process that functions partially outside the body and involves the replacement of the patient's plasma. It has been used in the ICU for a number of different disease states, for some as a first-line treatment modality and for others as a type of salvage therapy. This paper provides a brief review of the principles, current applications, and potential future directions of TPE in critical care settings.

Feasibility, Efficacy, and Safety of Peripheral Venous Access for Chronic Double-Filtration Plasmapheresis with Regional Citrate Anticoagulation.

INTRODUCTION: Peripheral venous access (PVA) is recommended as a first-line vascular approach for therapeutic plasmapheresis with centrifugation methods but not filtration, which usually requires high blood flow. We evaluated the feasibility, efficacy, and safety of double-filtration plasmapheresis (DFPP) with PVA, using ultrasound guidance and regional citrate anticoagulation (RCA), i.e., PVA-RCA-DFPP in patients undergoing chronic DFPP. Secondly, we assessed the number of central venous catheters (CVCs) avoided. METHODS: A single-center retrospective study evaluated 22 adult patients on chronic DFPP to perform PVA-RCA-DFPP. They were classified into 3 groups: successful (i.e., completion of sessions with PVA), primary failure (i.e., no sessions completed), secondary failure (i.e., ≥1 session with PVA completed but secondary return with CVC or arteriovenous fistula). RESULTS: Among the 22 patients included (64% men), 7 patients (32%) were classified as primary failures (2 patient refusals, 5 inadequate PVAs), 1 patient (5%) as a secondary failure (due to uncomfortable venipunctures), and 14 patients (64%) as successful. In the successful group including 12 patients treated for chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP) and 2 patients for familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) (2 patients), 116 sessions were performed, with a median treated plasma volume of 4.3 L [IQR 3.6-4.6] (45 mL/kg) for a median duration of 134 min [IQR 122-144], and a median blood flow of 94 mL/min [IQR 87-103]. For the CIDP group, 90% of sessions achieved a plasma volume >1 TPV, and for the FH group 91% of sessions achieved an LDLc reduction >60%. Eleven sessions out of 116 (9%) were interrupted, mostly due to PVA dysfunction (5/11) and circuit clotting (4/11). Session interruptions decreased significantly between each patient's first and following sessions (29% to 7%, p = 0.009). CONCLUSION: Chronic PVA-RCA-DFPP can be performed safely and efficiently, avoiding the use of CVCs.

Therapy plans for therapeutic apheresis in Epic HealthLink.

BACKGROUND: A common required duty of pathology resident physicians while rotating on transfusion medicine is the medical oversight of the therapeutic apheresis service. A task often performed on this clinical medicine service is formulating and writing orders for therapeutic apheresis procedures. The EpicCare tool called the therapy plan provides unique advantages over a standard electronic order set for therapeutic apheresis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Transfusion medicine physicians, apheresis nurses, pharmacists, and information technology professionals collaborated to create therapy plans for three therapeutic apheresis procedures: plasmapheresis, red cell exchange, and photopheresis. RESULTS: Therapy plans were implemented and have been well-received for several years. Over a six-year time period, a total of 613 therapy plans were created and signed. We speculate that this implementation may have increased both physician efficiency and patient safety. CONCLUSION: This article reports our experience using therapy plans in EpicCare in order to raise awareness of this tool and to serve as an encouragement for wider adoption.

Large volume plasmapheresis using a single-use immunoadsorption column: A cost-effective approach for desensitization in ABO-incompatible liver transplant.

INTRODUCTION: Liver transplant is a life-saving treatment, but due to the limited availability of suitable liver donors, ABO-incompatible liver transplants (ABOi-LT) are conducted to increase the availability of liver donors. Perioperative desensitization for ABOi-LT is an established strategy to circumvent the risk of graft rejection. A single prolonged session can be performed to achieve the desired titers to avoid using multiple immunoadsorption (IA) columns or off-label reuse of single-use columns. This study retrospectively assessed the effectiveness of a single prolonged plasmapheresis session using IA as a desensitization strategy in live donor liver transplant (LDLT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective observational study conducted at a center for liver diseases in North India on six ABOi-LDLT patients who underwent single prolonged IA sessions in the perioperative period from January 2018 to June 2021. RESULTS: Median baseline titer in patients was 320 (64, 1024). The median plasma volume adsorbed was 7.5 volumes (4, 8) per procedure, with a mean procedure time of 600 min (310-753). The reduction in titer ranged from 4 log to 7 log reduction per procedure. Two patients developed transient hypotension during the procedure, which was managed successfully. The median duration of pre-transplant hospital stay was 1.5 days (1, 3). CONCLUSION: Desensitization therapy helps overcome the ABO barrier and decreases the waiting period before a transplant when ABO identical donors are unavailable. A single prolonged IA session reduces the cost of additional IA columns and hospital stay, thus making it a cost-effective approach to desensitization.

Can Kunxian Capsule, a Novel Tripterygium Preparation be Used as an Adjuvant Treatment of Early Recurrent Focal Segmental Glomerular Sclerosis After Renal Transplantation? A Case Report.

Focal segmental glomerular sclerosis (FSGS) tends to recur after kidney transplantation, particularly when genetic testing is negative. Once the recurrence happens, the renal graft function can rapidly become impaired, following a massive urine protein loss. Despite intensive plasmapheresis and high-dose rituximab treatment, the complete remission rate remains below 50%. The Kunxian capsule, representing a new generation of tripterygium preparation, has shown promising results in controlling proteinuria in patients with IgA nephropathy. It is unclear whether Kunxian capsule treatment would also produce a favorable response in cases of FSGS recurrence. Here we report favorable results with this approach in a patient with early recurrent FSGS after kidney transplantation; we treated this patient successfully with a Kunxian capsule, a low dose of rituximab (200 mg), and reduced sessions of plasmapheresis. Complete remission, with a 90% reduction in total urine protein (0.81 g/24 h vs 8.3 g/24 h), was achieved within 2 weeks post-treatment. Of interest, the complete remission state in this patient has been maintained over 20 months with continuous administration of Kunxian capsules after the cessation of plasmapheresis. The potential mechanisms involved here include direct podocyte protection and the anti-inflammatory and immunosuppressive properties of triptolide in the Kunxian capsule. Our case may offer a new reference option for treating recurrent FSGS in the future.

Real-world application of plasmapheresis for neurological disease: Results from the Japan-Plasmapheresis Outcome and Practice Patterns Study.

INTRODUCTION: Plasmapheresis is a well-recognized treatment for autoimmune neurological diseases in Japan. However, the practice varies depending on the facility, and the actual treatment conditions are unclear. METHODS: To clarify real-world conditions, a prospective observational study was conducted on patients with neurological diseases who were scheduled to receive plasmapheresis. A dataset was analyzed that included 887 treatments from 210 patients with myasthenia gravis (MG), multiple sclerosis (MS), neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders (NMOSD), and other diseases for 82, 30, 24, and 74 patients, respectively. RESULTS: The types of plasmapheresis performed included immunoadsorption plasmapheresis, plasma exchange, and double filtration plasmapheresis with 620, 213, and 54 treatments, respectively. Approximately, 60% of the treatments were performed using peripheral blood access alone. Non-serious adverse events were observed in 10 patients. CONCLUSIONS: A statistically significant improvement was observed after plasmapheresis in patients with MG, MS, and NMOSD. These were evaluated using the modified Rankin Scale.

Experience of double plasma purification in 603 patients from a single center in Shanghai, China.

INTRODUCTION: To summarize the clinical experiences with double plasma purification (DPP). METHOD: Using Plasauto iQ automatic blood purification system, model KM-9000 for DPP. RESULTS: A total of 603 patients with different entity undergoing 811 purification procedures were included in this study. The most common purification modes were dual filtration plasma plasmapheresis (DFPP). Hyperlipidemia was the lead entity, 423 patients with hyperlipidemia performed DFPP, and two cases of severe acute pancreatitis caused by extremely high triglyceride levels completely recovered after two consecutive DFPP treatments. DFPP combined with immunosuppressants tended to decrease independent HD and reduced HD frequency in 53 patients with antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody-associated vasculitis. Two patients developed hypotensive or hypoglycemia episodes, respectively, during purification procedures. CONCLUSION: DPP is rapid for the treatment of patients with severe hyperlipidemia and acute pancreatitis caused by severely high triglyceride levels. For those who are intolerant to statins，DPP provides another treatment choice. DPP process is safe.

Feasibility, safety, and tolerability of two modalities of plasma exchange with albumin replacement to treat elderly patients with Alzheimer's disease in the AMBAR study.

BACKGROUND: In the Alzheimer Management by Albumin Replacement (AMBAR) study, mild-to-moderate Alzheimer's disease (AD) patients were treated with a plasma exchange (PE) program. Feasibility and safety of PE in this specific population are poorly understood and were analyzed in detail in this study. METHODS: Qualified patients were treated with 6 weeks of weekly conventional therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) with albumin replacement followed by monthly low-volume plasma exchange (LVPE) for 12 months. The patients were divided into four groups: placebo (sham PE treatment), low-albumin (20 g), low-albumin + intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) (10 g), and high-albumin (40 g) + IVIG (20 g). Adverse events (AEs) were recorded and analyzed for all PE treatment groups and PE modalities. RESULTS: PE procedure-related AEs were more common in the active treatment groups (16.9% out of 1283 TPE and 12.5% out of 2203 LVPE were associated with at least one AE, a similar rate than in other PE indications) than in the placebo group (0.7% out of 1223 sham PE). Percentage of procedures with at least one AEs was higher with central venous access compared to peripheral venous access in all three active treatment groups (20.1% vs 13.1%, respectively). CONCLUSION: The TPE and LVPE procedures used in the AMBAR study on mild-to-moderate AD population were as safe and feasible as in other therapeutic applications of PE or routine plasmapheresis.

Plasmapheresis compared with conventional treatment for hypertriglyceridemia-induced acute pancreatitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: The treatment of acute pancreatitis (AP) induced by hypertriglyceridemia (HTG) remains controversial with regard to plasmapheresis vs conventional treatment. We reviewed relevant articles to explore the efficacy of plasmapheresis in the management of HTG-induced AP. METHODS: We systematically reviewed studies that compared plasmapheresis with conventional treatment for HTG-induced AP using three databases: PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library, as well as relevant references. The primary outcomes were 24 h triglyceride reduction rate and in-hospital mortality. RESULTS: A total of 791 articles were retrieved. Finally, 15 observational studies (1080 participants) were included, most of which were historical cohort studies. Compared with conventional treatment, plasmapheresis assisted in the reduction of serum triglyceride (TG) levels in the first 24 h after hospital admission (standardized mean difference [SMD]: 0.58; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.17 to 0.99; P = 0.005). However, it resulted in increased hospitalization costs (thousand yuan) (weighted mean difference [WMD]: 24.32; 95% CI: 12.96 to 35.68; P < 0.001). With regard to in-hospital mortality, although the mortality rate in the plasmapheresis group was higher than that in the conventional treatment group (relative risk [RR]: 1.74; 95% CI: 1.03 to 2.94; P = 0.038), the result was disturbed by confounding factors as per the subgroup and sensitivity analysis, as well as trial sequential analysis (TSA). No significant differences were found in other outcomes, including systematic complications, local complications, the requirement for surgery, and hospitalization duration. CONCLUSION: The effect of plasmapheresis in HTG-induced AP is not superior to that of conventional treatment, even resulting in a greater economic burden to patients and health care system. High quality randomized control trials are required to obtain a more a definitive understanding of this issue.

A comparison of methods of plasmapheresis for the treatment of late antibody mediated rejection in kidney transplant recipients.

INTRODUCTION: We compared the outcomes associated with plasma exchange (PE), double filtration plasmapheresis (DFPP), or immunoadsorption (IA) in the treatment of late antibody mediated rejection (AMR). METHODS: Sixty-nine kidney transplantation (KTx) recipients with late AMR were retrospectively categorized according to management with PE (n = 30), DFPP (n = 22) or IA (n = 17). Allograft loss was compared across treatment groups by Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox regression. RESULTS: Study groups were similar regarding age, sex, donor type, kidney function, donor specific antibodies, and post-KTx follow-up time. Five-year graft survival trended higher with IA (70.6%) compared to PE (36.7%) and DFPP (27.3%) (p = 0.06). In multivariate Cox regression, baseline eGFR (HR per ml/min/1.73 m2 [95% CI]; 0.96 [0.94-0.99]), rituximab use (HR [95% CI]; 0.42 [0.21-0.84]), interstitial inflammation (i) (HR [95% CI]; 2.05 [1.13-3.69]), and transplant glomerulopathy (cg) (HR [95% CI]; 1.46 [1.13-1.87]) were associated with graft loss. CONCLUSION: These results motivate the need for continued assessment of rituximab and plasmapheresis in larger studies.

Efficacy and cost of double filtration plasmapheresis in severe hypertriglyceridemia-induced pancreatitis: A retrospective observational study.

BACKGROUND: The value of double filtration plasmapheresis (DFPP) in severe hypertriglyceridemia-induced pancreatitis (sHTGP) is controversial. This study aimed to investigate the efficacy of DFPP on clinical outcomes in patients with sHTGP and the costs associated with the procedure. METHODS: Patients who underwent DFPP after admission between January 2016 and December 2021 were recruited. Data on lipid profile, clinical parameters, and costs were retrospectively collected and analyzed. RESULTS: Fifty sHTGP patients who received DFPP were enrolled. All of the lipid profile were significantly reduced and maintained a downward trend. The APACHE II score on admission was higher and the reduction after DFPP was more obvious (P < 0.05) in patients with higher triglyceride (TG) levels (≥33.9 mmol/L) than in patients with lower TG levels. More material fees were expended in the higher TG group due to more DFPP sessions (P < 0.05), but no significant differences existed in total hospital costs between the two groups. CONCLUSION: DFPP could rapidly and effectively reduce TGs to a safe level. APACHE II score reduction was obvious in patients with TGs ≥33.9 mmol/L and was associated with lipid profile changes. DFPP may benefit sHTGP patients with a TG level higher than the current initiation threshold.

Monitoring and recovery of hyperglycaemia-induced endothelial dysfunction with rheopheresis in diabetic lower extremity ulceration with hyperviscosity.

AIMS: Rheopheresis is an extracorporeal haematotherapy that improves haemorheological status by filtering proteins that enhance blood viscosity. It also has anti-inflammatory effects by removing inflammatory cytokines. Our study aims to examine the effects of rheopheresis on the endothelial status in diabetic lower extremity ulceration. METHODS: In vitro experiments were performed in a HUVEC model to mimic hyperglycaemic stress. We determined the changes in gene expression levels of IL-6, IL-8, TNF-alpha, endothelin convertase enzyme, ET-1, and NO synthase, as well as the ROS and intracellular GSH levels upon hyperglycaemia. In in vivo studies, two rheopheresis procedures were performed on seven patients with diabetic lower extremity ulceration with hyperviscosity, and we measured the changes in plasma concentrations of ET-1, TXB2, SOD enzyme activity, and extracellular components of the glutathione pool depending on treatments. RESULTS: Our results showed that hyperglycaemia increases endothelial expression of inflammatory cytokines, ET-1, and endothelin convertase enzyme, while NO synthase was decreased. As a result of rheopheresis, we observed decreased ET-1 and TXB2 concentrations in the plasma and beneficial changes in the parameters of the glutathione pool. CONCLUSION: To summarize our results, hyperglycaemia-induced oxidative stress and endothelial inflammation can be moderated by rheopheresis in diabetic lower extremity ulceration with hyperviscosity.

Tandem hemodialysis and DFPP: Procedure, safety and cost-effectiveness in patients requiring chronic hemodialysis and lipid apheresis.

INTRODUCTION: Certain patients require simultaneous lipoprotein apheresis (LA) and intermittent hemodialysis (HD). Instead of undergoing 2 consecutive treatment sessions, a double filtration plasmapheresis (DFPP) and HD tandem procedure could be offered to reduce treatment times and costs. Our study evaluated the performance, safety and cost of this tandem procedure. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Three patients underwent 168 HD and DFPP tandem sessions in a tertiary center from August 2018 to November 2020, using a Fresenius 5008 generator for HD and an InfomedHF440 for DFPP. The system's efficacy was assessed by lipid subtraction performance for DFPP. Efficacy of 2 blood line connection configurations (parallel or sequential) was compared in terms of Kt/V and matched against an HD control session for each patient. Clinical and biological safety and the differential cost between tandem and consecutive procedures were evaluated. RESULTS: Throughout the tandem sessions, DFPP lasted 85 to 120 minutes, overlapping the 240-minute HD. Blood flow for HD and Kt/V were significantly lower during the tandem procedure with a parallel configuration compared to sequential or control paired HD. DFPP efficacy was comparable between all groups: over 60% reduction in cholesterol and over 50% for triglycerides. Symptomatic hypotension depended on the patients, not the procedure. The tandem procedure revealed an acceptable benefit-cost ratio. CONCLUSION: HD-DFPP tandem with a sequential blood line connecting system (derivation installed on the HD venous line) is effective and well-tolerated with a good cost-benefit ratio. Tandem reduces hospitalization and treatment session times and can be offered to patients requiring simultaneous HD and DFPP.

Double filtration plasmapheresis for hypertriglyceridemic acute pancreatitis caused by fat overload syndrome.

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE: Severe hypertriglyceridemia (HTG) can cause acute pancreatitis (AP). CASE SUMMARY: We report a patient with acute lymphoblastic leukaemia who received long-term intravenous parenteral nutrition solution without monitoring of the serum triglyceride (TG) level, which resulted in fat overload syndrome and HTG-AP. WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION: Double filtration plasmapheresis was performed to eliminate the TGs and treat the AP.

Protocol of comparison of the effects of single plasma exchange and double filtration plasmapheresis on peripheral lymphocyte phenotypes in patients with Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating Polyradiculoneuropathy: a monocentric prospective study with single-case experimental design.

BACKGROUND: Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating Polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP), a rare disorder affecting young adults, causes gradual weakness of the limbs, areflexia and impaired sensory function. New CIDP phenotypes without pathogenic antibodies but with modified cell profiles have been described. Treatments include corticotherapy, intravenous immunoglobulins, and plasmapheresis but the latter's action mechanisms remain unclear. Plasmapheresis supposedly removes toxic agents like antibodies from plasma but it is uncertain whether it has an immune-modulating effect. Also, the refining mechanisms of the two main plasmapheresis techniques-single plasma exchange and double filtration plasmapheresis (DFPP) - are different and unclear. This study aims to compare the evolution of peripheral lymphocyte profiles in patients with CIDP according to their treatment (single centrifugation plasmapheresis or DFPP) to better grasp the action mechanisms of both techniques. METHOD: In this proof-of-concept, monocentric, prospective, Single-Case Experimental Design study, 5 patients are evaluated by alternating their treatment type (single plasma exchange or DFPP) for 6 courses of treatment after randomization to their first treatment type. Each course of treatment lasts 2-4 weeks. For single plasma exchange, 60 ml/kg plasma will be removed from the patient and replaced with albumin solutes, with a centrifugation method to avoid the immunological reaction caused by the membrane used with the filtration method. For DFPP, 60 ml/kg plasma will be removed from the patient with a plasma separator membrane, then processed via a fractionator membrane to remove molecules of a greater size than albumin before returning it to the patient. This technique requires no substitution solutes, only 20 g of albumin to replace what would normally be lost during a session. The primary outcome is the difference between the two plasmapheresis techniques in the variation of the TH1/TH17 ratio over the period D0H0-D0H3 and D0H0-D7. Secondary outcomes include the variation in lymphocyte subpopulations at each session and between therapeutic plasmapheresis techniques, the clinical evolution, tolerance and cost of treatments. DISCUSSION: Understanding the action mechanisms of single plasma exchange and DFPP will help us to offer the right treatment to each patient with CIPD according to efficacy, tolerance and cost. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov under the no. NCT04742374 and date of registration 10 December 2020.